Girls Fastpitch Softball
Google
 
Web Girls-softball.com
A Guide to Girls Fastpitch Softball For Parents and Kids     
Gender

SOFTBALL TIPS
Rules
Hitting
Pitching
Defense
Parenting
Coaching
Team Directory
SITE STUFF
Girls Softball Home
Contact Us
Syndicate Our Content
About Us
Privacy Policy

ARCHIVES

June 26, 2005
July 03, 2005
July 10, 2005
July 17, 2005
July 24, 2005
July 31, 2005
August 07, 2005
August 14, 2005
August 21, 2005
August 28, 2005
September 11, 2005
October 02, 2005
October 09, 2005
October 23, 2005
October 30, 2005
November 06, 2005
November 13, 2005
December 04, 2005
December 18, 2005
December 25, 2005
January 08, 2006
January 15, 2006
January 29, 2006
February 05, 2006
February 12, 2006
February 19, 2006
February 26, 2006
March 05, 2006
March 12, 2006
March 19, 2006
March 26, 2006
April 02, 2006
April 09, 2006
April 16, 2006
April 23, 2006
April 30, 2006
May 07, 2006
May 14, 2006
May 21, 2006
May 28, 2006
June 04, 2006
June 11, 2006
June 18, 2006
June 25, 2006
July 09, 2006
July 16, 2006
July 23, 2006
July 30, 2006
August 13, 2006
August 20, 2006
September 03, 2006
September 10, 2006
September 17, 2006
September 24, 2006
October 01, 2006
October 08, 2006
October 15, 2006
October 22, 2006
November 12, 2006
November 26, 2006
December 31, 2006
January 14, 2007
January 21, 2007
January 28, 2007
February 04, 2007
February 11, 2007
February 18, 2007
February 25, 2007
March 04, 2007
March 11, 2007
March 18, 2007
April 01, 2007
April 08, 2007
April 15, 2007
April 22, 2007
April 29, 2007
May 06, 2007
May 13, 2007
May 20, 2007
May 27, 2007
June 03, 2007
June 10, 2007
June 17, 2007
June 24, 2007
July 01, 2007
July 22, 2007
July 29, 2007
August 12, 2007
August 19, 2007
September 02, 2007
September 16, 2007
September 30, 2007
October 07, 2007
October 14, 2007
October 21, 2007
November 04, 2007
November 18, 2007
November 25, 2007
December 02, 2007
December 09, 2007
December 16, 2007
January 13, 2008
February 17, 2008
February 24, 2008
March 02, 2008
March 09, 2008
March 30, 2008
April 06, 2008
April 13, 2008
April 20, 2008
April 27, 2008
May 04, 2008
May 11, 2008
May 18, 2008
May 25, 2008
June 01, 2008
June 15, 2008
June 22, 2008
June 29, 2008
July 06, 2008
July 13, 2008
July 20, 2008
August 03, 2008
August 10, 2008
August 17, 2008
August 24, 2008
August 31, 2008
September 07, 2008
September 14, 2008
September 21, 2008
September 28, 2008
October 05, 2008
October 12, 2008
October 19, 2008
October 26, 2008
November 02, 2008
November 09, 2008
November 16, 2008
November 30, 2008
December 07, 2008
December 21, 2008
December 28, 2008
February 15, 2009
February 22, 2009
April 12, 2009
April 19, 2009
April 26, 2009
May 03, 2009
May 10, 2009
May 17, 2009
May 24, 2009
May 31, 2009
June 07, 2009
June 14, 2009
June 21, 2009
July 05, 2009
July 12, 2009
July 19, 2009
August 02, 2009
August 30, 2009
September 06, 2009
September 20, 2009
October 04, 2009
October 11, 2009
October 18, 2009
November 08, 2009
November 15, 2009
November 22, 2009
November 29, 2009
December 27, 2009
January 03, 2010
January 10, 2010
January 17, 2010
January 24, 2010
January 31, 2010
March 14, 2010
March 21, 2010
March 28, 2010
April 04, 2010
April 18, 2010
April 25, 2010
SOFTBALL LINKS
Amateur Softball Association of America
International Softball Federation
National Fastpitch Coaches Association
Spy Softball
Fastpitch Recruiting
Little League
Protect Our Nation's Youth
FAST Sports
Kobata Skills Videos
Tightspin Pitching Trainer
 

2007 LLSWS Postlude

by Dave
Friday, August 17, 2007

This is a day late and probably a dollar short but I thought I'd publish something to wrap up the Little League Softball World Series.

I thought the level of play was pretty good in the championship game.   It wasn't great but it certainly wasn't bad.   In particular I liked the play by the left fielder in the final inning on that hard line drive.   I also liked the way the Texas team went down swinging, giving it their absolute best shot.   Had a few balls been driven to some gaps, the outcome might have been different.   I remain generally unimpressed by the pitching, not a big fan of the outfielding skills, a bit surprised there wasn't more hitting, and generally impressed by the play of the catchers.   My ASA/NSA/PONY/FAST-bias remains intact.   I didn't think the level of play was anywhere near what I have witnessed at that level.

In addition to my own opinions, I thought I'd share some of my visitors impressions.   Here are a few and, of course, I have included my reactions to those views:
  1. Patrick from Florida writes:

    "Just read your blog on LL semi's.   One thing to keep in mind.   At least here in Florida, at our LL All-star sectional tournaments (which is one level up from the initial district level tournament) a majority of the girls on all the teams were from travel ball teams.   Maybe that is just Florida.   But I would be willing to bet that the girls you are watching on TV are the same girls that play in the ASA tournaments you attend."

    My reply:

    I do know that there are travel players playing in the LLSWS.   But just because teams have travel players doesn't mean the teams themselves are travel ball quality.   And not a high percentage of travel players participate in the LL tournament.

    In order to play on a LL tournsament team, girls are supposed to participate in the rec league the particular LL organization runs.   Then the tournament team is picked from the league itself or via a tryout.   This is not an open tryout for anyone who wants to play but rather a tryout open to the girls from the rec league.   And once play begins, girls cannot rejoin their travel clubs until after their team has been eliminated from the LL tournament.

    Players eligible for LL tournament play include those who, meeting other requirements, particularly with respect to age and residency, have "participated as an eligible player in one-half the regular season games ... with the exception of school softball season."

    Also according to LL rules, "a player may participate in other youth softball programs prior to the first scheduled game involving that player's team.   Once play begins for a tournament team, players named on that team's tournament affidavit may not participate in any other youth softball program until that team is eliminated from tournament play."

    Finally, LL rules generally do not allow tournament teams to form up until after rec play has concluded.   I don;t have the rules in front of me but team selection cannot take place until something like 2 weeks before the tournament begins.   That reduced the quality of the teams because, as anyone can tell you, girls teams don't even begin to jell until after their first year playing together.   From year to year, the LL tournament team might include the same kids so the 12U teams at the televised LLSWS might have played together since they were in t-ball, but that's not supposed to be the case.   And the travel players on LL teams do not practice together year round nor play 100 games together each year.

    It might not be patently obvious but the last thing any travel club coach wants is to train a group of girls and have 4 or 5 disappear in order to participate in the LL tournament.   In fact, many such coaches tell their team players and parents participation in rec softball of any kind is a bad idea since travel clubs themselves, especially good ones, will practice frequently and play anywhere from 50 - 100 games and scrimmages during a year.   Playing another 10 - 20 rec games plus 5 or more tournament games is too much on girls' bodies at this age.   But aside from beating the girls' bodies up, coaches worry about being able to field a team throughout their tournament season.   They don't want to show up on elimination day of a national qualifier with 7 or 8 kids.   If you sign up for a travel team, in general, they want you committed to at least 90% of the team's tournaments and 100% committed to the important ones, many of which take place during the preliminary rounds of the LL tournament.

    I know of two decent travel teams which had quite a few girls who wanted to play the LL tournament.   The teams knew this from the outset.   One agreed to disband their 12U team at the start of LL tournament play.   I talked to the father of a girl on that team and he told me this was their last year of playing LL.   The team was generally upset they had decided to disband because they had qualified for nationals.   But they couldn't go because so many players had left.

    The second team which contained a number of LL players continued to play in other tournaments minus the 4 or 5 girls who had left for their LL teams.   We played them and beat them pretty badly.   Their coaches were upset about the girls leaving.   They failed to gain a berth to nationals this year so when those girls LL teams were defeated, they came back to a much reduced schedule.   I doubt organization officials will allow this to happen again.

    In addition to travel organizations not enjoying it when their girls leave for LL tournament teams and therefore discouraging the practice, there is another factoid to consider.   The girls from these travel teams who left for LL teams did not all join the same team.   For example, the team which disbanded right after gaining a bid to nationals sent kids to no fewer than 5 LL teams.   The other talent on those teams was not top level travel talent.   And because those teams could only form up beginning in late June, the travel players did not have the opportunity to teach the other kids what they know.   The teams were not travel club quality.

    I'm not sure I have made my point but what I'm after is that on any of these LLSWS teams, you maybe have 2 bona fide "A" level travel players.   On a top ten (at any nationals) team, you have 11, 12, or 13 bona fide "A" level travel players with a couple exceptional ones.

    Note that there was no team from southern CA in the semi-finals.   Yet a very high percentage of Div I college players come from SoCal.   The same is true for Arizona, Florida, Texas, Washington, and a few other states.   In Florida, you have over the past two decades created one of the best youth travel systems in the country - a good number of FL kids also play college ball.   Yet there was no Florida representative in the semi-finals.   There was a Texas team but I'd be surprised if that was representative of travel level teams in Texas - it was a very small community with not a huge number of 11 and 12 year old girls from which to pick a team.

  2. Bryan from Iowa writes:

    I felt complelled to write you after reading today's post..."Green Pastures".   I too watched a little of the games last night and was very dissapointed ... You see my 12 year old has been playing ASA travel ball for 4 years now.   I have seen tremendous level of play at the 12U level.

    When watching the LLWS semi-final games I really expected that higher level of play.   This sounds terrible to say, but my daughter walked by the TV (she loves to play, but hates to watch on TV) and stopped for a few minutes & then said, 'They stink.'   Painfully honest, she is at times.   I am not being arrogant, but there are MANY teams in the 12U "A" class in Iowa that would run-rule those teams.   I was confused at the grass infield & the lead off rule.   Both make no sense, and slow an otherwise exciting game.   To be honest, I have never seen a Little League Softball game before ... just ASA.

    In the past 4 years, my family has been indoctrinated to ASA fastpitch softball.   And we love it!   My daughter's team has traveled to quite a few tournaments that require overnight stay in a hotel (part of the fun for the girls, you know) and play between 60-80 games each spring and some in the fall.   You know, a typical ASA travel team.   We spend gobs of money, but trade it for memories that last a life time!"


    My reply:

    Bryan, I agree with you.   My 12 year old daughter mostoly agrees with yours.   My daughter, however, does like watching softball on TV and in person.   She was glued to the set for most of the NCAA games which were televised this year - we buy a college sports package.   She also watched a high school aged "all-star" game recently.   She accompanies us when we go to watch local high school and college games.   She is a student of the game.   She thought the level of play was pretty low.   She thought the pitching was poor.   She did not stay to watch much.

  3. Chris from Tennessee writes:

    "Prior to finding your site, I had never heard of LLSWS.   You have been pretty critical of LLSWS in the past, and after watching the semi-final games and part of the finals, I think you are spot on.   I was not at all impressed with the play I saw.   I coach a 12U travel team that played C class ball this year (my team was all 11 year olds but 2) and hope to compete at the B level this coming year.   As you state in your article from yesterday, watching from TV can be deceiving, but I have no doubt that my team could play with and probably beat all of the teams in the semi-finals, and I don't think we are that good.   One of the things that I think hurts youth softball is the fact that there are so many sanctioning bodies these days.   We play predominately USSSA because that is what is most popular around here.   Yet I know that on a national level ASA is where we should strive to be."

    My reply:

    Chris, I don't always mention USSSA but I mean to include them in the travel mix.   I totally agree with you that there are too many sanctioning bodies.   It is confusing, when one is starting out, to figure what is the best kind of play to pursue.   In my area, we mostly play PONY at 10U and 12U.   Then the girls move on to a lot of NSA, though many stay with PONY.   By 14 or 15, the best girls are all playing ASA and showcase tournaments, some few move to FAST which is gaining ground.   As I understand things, in Florida, a lot of teams play FAST.   In some states, it's ASA or no play.   Yet even in my state, some teams play ASA.   A few participate in something called ISA but even those teams sometimes go to nationals put on by PONY and NSA.   While there is no question that ISF is the worldwide governing body for softball and ASA is the US body, the teams which compete in the various sanctioning bodies' tournaments typically do so in pursuit of the "right level" of play.

Labels:

Permanent Link:  2007 LLSWS Postlude


Green Pastures

by Dave
Wednesday, August 15, 2007

Last night, while watching the semi-finals of the Little League Softball World Series (LLSWS), I checked my e-mails between innings.   I had resolved to not write anything about the LLSWS, lest I end up being hyper-critical of an event which is, in retrospect important for the advancement of the sport.   The e-mail came from Brad in Texas who wondered, "what's up with the grass infield?"   I wrote back to Brad that I had the very same question immediately upon tuning in to the program.   Why does Little League insist on playing their marquee softball competition on a field entirely inappropriate for the sport?

Several years ago, I got into a somewhat heated discussion with a father of two girls who played in the softball division of our local Little League.   He complained that their was gender bias in the league (undoubtedly there was and is to this day) because the boys "get to play on the 'good field' while the girls play on the lousy ones."   When I asked him what he meant, he said the boys play on the one good field next to the concession stand with the well manicured, grassy infield.   I replied that I wasn't offended by the custom since softball is played on a skin field.   He laughed and told me that just wasn't so.   He had seen tons of softball games played on grass fields.   I asked if he had ever seen college, high school, ASA, or any other sanctioning body's games (other than Little League) played on a grass field.   He got kind of angry with me and the details of the remainder of the discussion don't warrant further discussion.   The point is, this Little League father believed softball is frequently played on a grass field.   There was nothing I could have said to this fellow to convince him how wrong he was.

Let's be clear about a few things.   Fastpitch softball is not hardball played with a bigger, yellow ball with 60 foot bases, by girls.   The games are undeniably cousins, or siblings, but the play is not all that similar.   Softball is faster than baseball in relative terms.   There's more bunting.   Defense is different since there is little time to recover from a flubbed grounder.   At the 12U level, at least with LL's rules, the games do appear to be close cousins but the reality of fastpitch play style, as it moves up the ladder, is very different than hardball.

Grass infields change important aspects of that play style.   For one thing, the slower infield changes bunting.   Even a poor bunt has a decent chance of being successful when it hits grass and immediately slows.   Grass infields also remove slapping from play since you can't bounce a ball over the third baseman's head when playing on grass, at least not when 12 year olds are doing the slapping.   Grounders have less chance of getting through for the same reason.   Routine grounders, for example, to second become far more difficult when the ball is slowed to the degree it is on grass.   Hard grounded singles become better opportunities to score runners from second than they should be because the ball takes a half second longer to reach the fielder.   There's a reason why every other sanctioning body utilizes skin fields for their games.

It probably is not apparent, however, to the LL powers that grass infields change the game.   Based on the level of play I watched last night, the grass did not impact the outcome of games.   There was little bunting by the four teams.   Only one team attempted bunts more than once or twice.   I saw zero slappers on the four teams.   And baserunning was very safe with even good teams with sizeable leads not trying to score aggressively.   The two games were very much like the 12 year old baseball games I had been watching and not very similar to the fastpitch softball games I've been watching all summer.   I doubt Little League even gave a second thought to the style of field.

Little League rules are more similar this year to those of other sanctioning bodies.   Last year they used an 11 inch ball while the rest of the country played with the 12.   This probably yielded more offense as the bigger ball is, obviously, pitched at slower speeds and easier to hit because of its size.   Still there are important differences which make the game different than the ASA variety.

There is no dropped third strike rule in LL play.   I have to admit that this could be an improvement as I have watched too many games this year turn on a dropped third in late innings.   It is difficult to find qualified catchers at this age.   On the other hand, any purist would disagree.   The dropped third is just as much a part of the game as the infield fly rule.   Most good catchers in ASA play do not drop third strikes frequently and when they do, they usually have no trouble tagging or throwing the batter/baserunner out.   Many tournaments, even at 10U, use the dropped third rule without a huge impact.   I think I'll sit on the fence on this one.

It is my understanding that in Little League runners cannot leave base until the pitched ball reaches the batter.   If I'm wrong on this, please feel free to correct me.   That was the rule when I was involved with LL.   I haven't seen where it changed.   In other sanctioning bodies' play, the baserunners may leave their base when the ball is released by the pitcher.   That may not seem like a huge difference to the layman but it slows the stealing runner by at least a half second.   As a consequence, I believe, there was little stealing in these semi-final contests except on first and third situations.   That changes the game quite a bit.   There is a ton of stealing in ASA play unless a team has a very well trained catcher.   This also changes the opportunities for runners to advance successfully on fielders choices of all kinds.   That further removes bunting from the mix.   On some occassions last night I saw decent bunts result in the lead runner being thrown out.   I was surprised by this and at first blamed it on poor baserunning.   Then I remembered that the runners had to wait until the ball reached the batter.   I won't sit on the fence on this one.   I don't like holding the runner back in this fashion.   It creates a different game.

There are one or two important rule differences between LL and other bodies which while they impact the games, do not make as much difference as you might think at first blush.   LL pitchers are restricted from pitching back to back games.   In order to be successful in LL tournament play, you've got to have at least two decent pitchers.   In ASA and other play, there is no restriction to how many games a pitcher can pitch.   I have seen teams which rely on a single ace to propel them deep into elimination days.   But, as I said, this doesn't quite have the impact you would expect.   The reason is non-LL tournaments typically play three or more games in a single day during championship rounds.   Sometimes a team must win four or more games in order to claim a trophy.   This makes club teams stockpile pitching at least as much as LL teams since it is often not possible for a single girl at this age, even a monsterous one, to pitch three or four quality games in a day.   But I suspect what I saw last night was the second best pitchers for these teams in the semi-final round since they need to hold their aces back for the championship if they want to have a chance to win.

Aside from these rule differences, I'm not sure what else is out there.   But I did notice stylistic differences between the LL variety of play and the kind I am more familiar with.   Corner infielders mostly positioned themselves at the infield cutouts.   I don't know about you but our corner infielders generally play a lot closer than that.   If we played a game and saw infielders that far back, we'd bunt endlessly until they came up.   And middle infielders were deeper than I usually see them.   One second baseman played almost all the way to the outfield grass like the way a baseball second basman might position himself.   We occassionally play that deep but only when there is a lefty power hitter up who can't run very fast.   The rest of the time, our second basemen play in front of the baseline, more towards first base.

I suppose the positioning could be a deliberate strategy employed based on the grass infield.   Pitchers have an easier time fielding bunts when they are slowed by grass.   There isn't the need to pull in the corners that exists with a skin infield.   And playing your middle infielders deeper makes sense too since the ground balls are slowed and you have more opportunity to cut off balls that would otherwise be basehits.   Outfielders have to play closer and quickly charge since they have to try to get to the few grounded singles in a hurry to prevent runners from advancing additional bases.

There were some other differences in the play I observed which had nothing to do with rule or field differences.   I recognize that the talent pool is necessarily smaller with a community based team than it is with a successful travel club program.   Clubs can recruit players from far away.   If they build a successful program, the good players automatically come to them.   In Little League, you either live in the area over which a particular organization presides or you don't.   There are obvious advantages to this.   But it does change the level of play since the talent pool is smaller.

I was not overly impressed with the teams that made up the semi-final round.   My guess is the top 20 12U teams in ASA, NSA, PONY, FAST, etc. would eat these teams alive.   The level of infield play was pretty good by the Texas team but the rest seemed as if they had two or more holes.   Given the level of pitching, which I'll get to in a second, there was far less hitting than I would otherwise expect.   Team speed, even given the restrictive baserunning rules, was not anywhere near what I have seen in other games.   Outfielding skills were definiteloy subpar.

Top club teams are, of course, able to draw kids from as far away as an hour and a half, sometimes further.   That gives them the opportunity to pull 12 high quality players together, practice them over the winter months, play close to 100 games together as a unit during any given year, and replace subpar players as the years go by.   At the end of the 12U year, a very good team often has kids who, in majority, have played together for as long as four years, over the span of as many as 400 games.   They know each other the way an NCAA team knows each other, sometimes more so.   Also, because they have all this real world experience, they are able to find the right position for a kid (which sometimes includes the bench or on any other team but theirs) and fill in positions with very good players from far away.   On the whole, good travel teams are far better than these LL semi-finalists.

As a result of the talent pool available to club teams, the good ones generally have high quality hitters from 1 to 12 or however many they carry on their rosters.   In the high quality games I have seen, there is far more hitting than was evident in LL last night.   The two winning teams did do decent jobs with the bat but there were far fewer hard hit balls and no homeruns.   Given the mediocre pitching level, I would have expected to see more kids go yard.   I have watched as high caliber club teams hit homerun after homerun against similar pitching.   But even when the ball doesn't go out of the yard, even when outs are made, there are usually more hard hit balls than I saw during these two games.

It is difficult to really get a handle on the pitching level from the TV set (even a big one) but I found the girls reasonably good though not quite as good as I had expected.   There are excellent 12 year old pitchers out there for sure.   Some few throw as hard as 60 mph with outstanding control and remarkable movement.   There's a kid on a 12U NSA team from Kentucky who hits 60 often, throws five legitimate pitches, and usually ... wins.   The typical high quality ace on a good ASA 12U team is around 55 or above, unless she has pinpoint accuracy and excellent movement, in which case slower pitchers can have a lot of success.

The radar gun on the TV set last night told me these girls were throwing around 50-55.   55 was rare and 52 seemed to be about the norm.   I question whether anyone threw as hard as 55 but there's no way for me to prove the point.   I suspect the radar gun was not calibrated properly as one pitch, obviously off-speed, registered 63.   There's no way that was accurate.   But based on my observations of the time it took for released pitches to reach home, I question even the 54s and 55s.   I've caught pitchers throwing everywhere between 40 mph and bona fide 60.   I have caught literally hundreds of thousands of pitches, observed an even greater amount, and feel I have a pretty good sense of how hard a pitcher throws by judging release point and catcher mitt impact.   If I had to guess at the fastest pitches I saw last night, I would liberally call them low 50s, maybe 52-53.   Most of the rest were at best, upper 40s, a few low 40s.

Movement seemed a little weak.   I saw one girl who threw a decent screwball and I watched a handful of decent change-ups.   Most of what I saw were peel-off drops, fastballs and fastball that looked like the pitchers were trying to throw other sorts of pitches.   One or two pitchers had good control, often hitting the outside corner, whether it was called a strike or not (something I don't wish to get into at this juncture - plate umpiring was poor!)   There were no rises, flip drops, drop curves, or other movement pitches which are commonplace in 12U tournament ball involving club teams.   At the absolute least, I would have expected to see more changes thrown.   I have called more changes for my pitcher on one batter than I saw in both games combined!

During one game, the announcers claimed one pitcher had something like 8 pitches which her father called from the dugout.   It is very possible that a girl this age is working on 8 pitches.   The Kentucky girl I mentioned above had 5 very workable pitches.   Even the best of the four LL pitchers had no more than 3 functioning ones.   Maybe her father was calling multiple pitch types but the movement isn't there yet on at least five of them.   The best pitches I observed last night were peel-off drops (though I suspect that's all the pitcher threw - in other words it was her fastball); fastballs; one decent change; and a couple screws.   The best aspect to the pitching was the ability of one girl to hit the outside and low corner repeatedly.

I said before that I would have expected to see more hitting.   Given the 50 mph fastball pitching which was more the norm in these two games, I'm surprised a few balls weren't hit out of the yard or at least back to the fence.   Even average tournament teams I have observed - ones that do not draw from a big geographic area - have no trouble pounding pitching like this.   There did not seem to be any big hitters in any of the four lineups involved.   I don't expect twelve lil' slammers but I do expect more than was evident.

One of the things I found most interesting last night was the age mix of the Connecticut team.   If I'm not mistaken, of the 11 or 12 kids on their roster, 7 were 12U eligible next year.   These girls took their lumps in this semi-final game, making many errors and not taking advantage of their opportunities to change the game - particularly in the first inning.   I sincerely hope they aren't too upset today about the beating they took.   It is remarkable to see such a young team go far in any tournament.   I'll go out on a limb here and predict that we will see this team again next year, perhaps in the finals.   These 11 year olds gained invaluable experience they ought to bring back to the LLSWS next year.

There have been a few times over the past couple of years in which I have seen predominantly 11 year old, mixed age teams go far into 12U tournaments.   That is not the norm, however.   Usually even very good mixed age teams get slammed.   That's why many organizations stick with one age.   Often a team of 11 year olds will bring in one or two 12 year old pitchers just to keep them competitive.   Then the next year they'll play as exclusively 12 year olds.   Very few predominantly 11 year old teams play more than a game or two on elimination days.   This Connecticut team will presumably return most of their players and, if they have pitching, they'll be hard to beat.

I've gone on long enough about the LL semi-finals.   Hard to believe but I started this thread just to say fastpitch softball is played on skin fields not grass!   But now I have done what I set out not to do - be critical of Little League play.   Understand that this blog is just a place to voice my opinions about things.   I don't have anything per se against LL.   They are good ambassadors of our sport - they get the TV coverage.   If you'd like to watch the champinship game, which should involve better pitching than the semi's - it'll be broadcast tonight on ESPN2.

I'm sure I'll have something to say after the finals.   But I'm going to try to be positive this time around!

Labels:

Permanent Link:  Green Pastures


Softball Sales

The Sports Authority

Shop for
Sporting Goods
at Modells.com

SPONSORS

Gender


Shop for
Sporting Goods
at Modells.com


Powered by Blogger

All Contents Copyright © 2005-2008, Girls-Softball.com, All Rights Reserved